VIDEO
Open with transcript & summary → Search this meeting's transcript →
The Hood County Commissioners Court held a special called workshop meeting on September 30, 2024, to present Workshop Two of the Master Thoroughfare Plan update study, which is guiding long-range transportation planning for the county's projected 60 percent population growth over 45 years. The study team presented modeling results for six priority corridors, demonstrating positive impacts on traffic flow and regional connectivity, while addressing identified safety concerns such as flooding access issues and railroad crossings. Discussion included coordination with Johnson County's planning efforts, the importance of the mobility plan for securing state funding, and the significant costs and multi-county partnerships required for major improvements like Old Granbury Road. The meeting concluded with information on next steps, including public feedback collection before determining whether to revise the model or proceed toward draft report and adoption.
Call to order and opening The special called workshop meeting of Hood County Commissioners Court was called to order with invocation and pledges. Master Thoroughfare Plan update study introduction Ryan Jones introduced Workshop number two of the MTP update study as both a formal workshop and public meeting to gather community feedback. Study team and consultant introduction TMP engineering design consultants and Council of Governments staff were introduced as members of the project team. Meeting logistics and feedback process Attendees were directed to sign in and informed of the comment form process for providing feedback. Purpose and importance of Master Thoroughfare Plan The MTP is a long-range transportation planning document guiding thoroughfare improvements to meet population growth and traffic demands. Growth forecasts and community priorities Hood County is forecasted to grow 60 percent over 45 years, with traffic and pedestrian circulation identified as the most important issue facing Granbury. Study partnership and team structure The study involves partnership with COG, a steering committee including court and municipal officials, a technical committee, and public input. North Central Texas Council of Governments background COG background information was included at staff request to provide context on the regional planning organization. Steering committee composition and role The steering committee serves as the primary source of guidance and decision-making throughout the study process. Project timeline and study steps The study commenced in March 2024 with formation of committees, followed by workshops and a special court meeting in May. Workshop one goals and identified issues Workshop one identified 18 known issues and 18 potential solutions, with primary goals to relieve traffic congestion and provide additional routes. Feedback coordination and prioritization process After Workshop one, COG and TMP met to discuss feedback and determine that the 18 alternatives needed to be prioritized to a smaller, more manageable number for modeling. Priority corridors identification Six priority corridors were identified as near-term needs, including Theon Plantation access, Old Granbury Road, Fall Creek Highway, new east-west routes, and Misty Meadows Drive extension. Modeling process and data preparation COG incorporated the six priority corridors into their Mobility 2045 model after obtaining coding information about functional class, lane configuration, speed limits, and intersection control. Modeling output analysis and heat map methodology The modeling output was analyzed using volume change data to create a heat map showing traffic impact across the region, with colors indicating reduction, minimal impact, or increase in traffic. Modeling results summary The proposed improvements showed positive impacts with reduced congestion on key corridors like US 144, US 377, FM 167, and State Highway 171, while increasing mobility to US 67 and Chism Parkway. Level of service and congestion metrics All Hood County roads received level of service A or C; most areas analyzed were closer to 1.0 on level of congestion metric, significantly below the 1.4 threshold indicating problematic congestion. Safety improvements and additional concerns Beyond modeling-based improvements, various safety concerns were identified including railroad crossing issues, flooding access problems, and connections to isolated areas. Impact of new routes and positive results New routes and connections identified in the study showed greatly positive impact on the road network and regional mobility. COG modeling team presentation - overview Wade, a senior transportation planner with Council of Governments, and Chris, a principal transportation planner with COG, provided additional context on the modeling process and results. Regional connections analysis The modeling revealed that the southern connection to US 67 was unexpectedly effective as an alternate route, particularly for regional traffic from Dallas and Fort Worth providing a southern entrance into Hood County and Granbury. Old Granbury Road modeling correction The original model showed zero traffic on Old Granbury Road in 2045 due to connection issues, requiring manual adjustment to provide proper connectivity and realistic traffic projections. Volume impact and spillover analysis Chris noted that examining maps requires looking at impacts on surrounding roads, demonstrating how new connections shift traffic patterns across the network. Color coding clarification Chris clarified that colors on the map are indicators, not inherently good or bad, requiring context-specific interpretation based on study goals. Public question period - general modeling questions The presentation paused for public questions on the modeling aspects and findings before moving to next steps. Theon Plantation and Shroud Creek flooding access discussion A detailed discussion of the Theon Plantation area revealed that when Shroud Creek floods, a low-water crossing isolates a residential neighborhood with no alternate access points, necessitating a new connection. Mitchell Bend extension and property concerns Discussion of the proposed Mitchell Bend extension revealed the need to cross the Brazos River and cross private property, with questions raised about impact on neighboring residential areas. Johnson County plan coordination Wade noted that Johnson County is also updating their thoroughfare plan and has been made aware of Hood County's proposed alignments, with plans to potentially incorporate similar improvements. Project timeline and public engagement process The presentation concluded with next steps toward finalizing the mobility plan by March 2025, and public comment mechanisms were made available. Plan adoption and county benefits The adopted plan will provide an updated roadway network map, public documentation, and right-of-way preservation tools for future growth. Mobility plan as prerequisite for state funding A mobility plan is essential leverage when requesting funding from state legislators and agencies like TxDOT. Old Granbury Road cost and multi-county coordination Old Granbury Road improvements alone represent a major expense requiring multi-county partnerships and state involvement. Funding mechanisms and county cost-share requirements Counties are statutorily required to fund 10% of state highway improvements, creating shared costs that must be planned for. Crescent project timeline and NRC safety catalyst The Crescent project, which began in 2007, demonstrates how long road infrastructure takes and how nuclear safety concerns accelerated funding. TxDOT funding constraints and gas tax stagnation Texas transportation funding has not kept pace with vehicle efficiency improvements or state population growth. Crescent Boulevard completion status and challenges The Crescent Boulevard project, initiated in 2007, has faced prolonged timelines but recently showed construction acceleration. Development activity and population growth Significant development is already occurring in the area, with thousands of planned lots supporting the need for infrastructure planning. Next steps: feedback collection and potential workshop reconvening The process will pause to gather public feedback before deciding whether to reconvene, revise the model, or proceed to draft report and adoption hearing.