October 31, 2019 Hood County Economic Development Workshop

Open with transcript & summary →Search this meeting's transcript →

The Hood County Economic Development Workshop on October 31, 2019, introduced the chamber's newly hired economic development director and discussed a comprehensive regional strategy emphasizing workforce development, business retention, and targeted industry recruitment. Key initiatives outlined include establishing a GIS mapping system to streamline prospect responses, forming an advisory committee to guide strategy, and pursuing manufacturing and innovation-sector companies offering wages above $55,000 annually. The discussion addressed both opportunities—including eight active projects representing $823 million in capital investment and 2,500 jobs—and challenges, particularly the 72-minute average commute that causes economic leakage and the need for regional coordination given land scarcity. Participants also reviewed lessons from the county's prior Economic Development Corporation (2006–2014) and debated governance, funding models, and the appropriate scope of government involvement in economic development.

• Introduction and chamber economic development hireThe chamber has hired a new economic development director with state and national experience in the field.
• Regional versus single-entity approach to economic developmentHopkins advocated for marketing the region as a whole rather than individual cities, mirroring the Dallas Regional Chamber's long-standing strategy.
• Education alignment with business needsHopkins identified workforce skills gaps and insufficient educational attainment as key economic development priorities.
• Quality of life and commute challengesSeventy-two percent of county residents commute over 31 minutes each way to work, causing economic leakage and reducing family engagement.
• Business retention and expansion programHopkins will prioritize supporting existing businesses to prevent recruitment by other communities.
• Economic development advisory committeeAn advisory committee will give the business community formal voice in economic development strategy.
• Support for innovation ecosystemHopkins wants to cultivate culture and resources for locally generated business ideas.
• Attraction strategy and RFI responseHopkins will manage incoming requests for information (RFIs) from prospect companies, currently handling 98 active projects from her Fort Worth role.
• Geographic information systems (GIS) interactive mappingHopkins prioritizes building a GIS map showing regional land access, infrastructure, and capacity to streamline prospect inquiries.
• Target market identificationHopkins will work with stakeholders to identify which industries best match the region's assets and competitive advantages.
• Current project pipeline and capital investmentEight projects are on the short list or submitted, representing $823 million in capital investment and 2,500 total jobs.
• RFI project types and qualification processProjects come from state leads, regional chambers, company direct contact, and site selectors; qualification narrows submissions based on specific parameters.
• Examples of target industriesProspect industries include solar panel manufacturing, aerospace manufacturing, and back-office operations attracted to proximity to Metroplex without Tarrant County costs.
• Company location preferences: city versus countyCompanies prioritize land and infrastructure availability over city versus county location; regional amenities are close enough for either.
• Multi-community support and expansion beyond GranberryCounty communities including Crescent have expressed interest in participating in and funding regional economic development efforts.
• Business recruitment and relocation examplesGordon Bond and other local businesses have been repeatedly approached by other regions seeking relocation; others have locations in other Texas areas actively recruiting inward.
• Incentive structure and cost-benefit analysisHopkins explains that incentives are contingent on project completion, returning tax dollars after abatement; she also performs cost-of-living and payroll comparisons.
• Transportation infrastructure and GIS urgencyBiggest current barrier is not knowing what infrastructure exists; real-time data is critical because RFIs often require 48-hour turnarounds.
• Traffic congestion and company concernsTraffic patterns are considered in prospect analysis, but most target companies are not heavily trafficked operations; some may use alternate routes via Highway 377 and Weatherford.
• Competitive analysis with adjacent countiesChisolm, Montague County, and Highway 20 to Weatherford represent competitive territory, making target industry selection critical to avoid direct competition.
• Education programming devil's advocate challengeA questioner challenged how the economic development director addresses education issues beyond alignment, prompting Hopkins to detail prior CTE and talent development work.
• CTE marketing and certificate programsHopkins previously created talent development programs, including "Next University" marketing campaign and paid CTE programming, launching with 42 students earning certificates.
• Focus on under-served students and upskillingHopkins emphasizes supporting lower-performing students who typically stay in the community rather than top-10% students who leave; programming should offer alternatives to high school diplomas.
• Local career and technology programs as economic development assetsGranberry and other schools teach applied skills like building construction, mechanics, plumbing, and electrical work; these programs are described as a "goldmine" by visiting international company.
• Skills gap and workforce demand dataHopkins seeks specific data on certificate welder programs within Hood County radius; past queries and site visits confirm skilled trades shortage is a major prospect attraction point.
• Business hiring obstacles and maintenance professionalsInitial retention conversations ask businesses to identify hardest positions to fill; maintenance professionals with broad experience are identified as most difficult hires in Tarrant County.
• Chamber of commerce role and cross-field scopeThe chamber addresses issues "most people think just happened" and operates across all fields, including education, justifying its economic development involvement.
• Government role in economic developmentAn elected official articulated concerns about the appropriate scope of government involvement in economic development and the challenge of defining community growth goals.
• Growth management and tax base sustainabilityThe speaker argued that managed growth generates tax revenue needed to control property taxes and that proactive planning is preferable to reactive crisis management.
• Contract flexibility and county attorney reviewThe proposed economic development contract is described as generic and open to modification, with county attorney input already obtained.
• Land availability and project opportunitiesScarcity of available land does not preclude attracting companies; alternative deal structures and county properties offer potential.
• Project approval process and decision-making authorityAll projects are subject to review by county and city officials, with each jurisdiction having input and a voice in the decision, though not necessarily formal voting authority.
• Incentive standards and wage requirementsTax incentive policies are tied to wage thresholds; Fort Worth does not incentivize companies paying average wages below $55,000 annually unless very large job numbers justify exceptions.
• Business community representation and focusThe advisory committee will include manufacturers and businesses whose profits come from outside the county, reflecting the state legislature's definition of economic development as bringing new dollars into the region.
• Regional competition and neighboring county strategiesParker County recently established a regional economic development entity and landed a major Australian company; Hood County is exploring partnership opportunities to share tools and avoid duplicating costs.
• Funding models and private sector investmentEconomic development in larger metros is funded through private business investment due to major company scale; alternative funding approaches are needed for smaller communities.
• Historical Economic Development Corporation (2006–2014)Hood County's prior Economic Development Corporation disbanded in 2014 due to structural problems including inability to maintain confidentiality, funding instability, and governance conflicts between city and county.
• Prior corporation's focus and success recordThe defunct corporation primarily pursued retail and shopping center businesses without achieving significant measurable success; strategy differed from current focus on manufacturing and new-dollar injection.
• Transparency and legal changes regarding confidentialityNew state law effective September 1 provides government entities with exceptions to disclosure requirements for economic development activities, addressing prior confidentiality concerns that hindered the old corporation.
• County-wide resource mapping and property inventoryA comprehensive property and resource inventory across all county precincts is needed but has not been systematically cataloged; GIS mapping could provide a living database, similar to realtor.com features.
• Land use planning and inventory needsDiscussion of the need for comprehensive land use planning and an inventory of available properties to support economic development prospects.
• Regional coordination and project pipelineEconomic development prospects benefit from regional coordination, as individual municipalities have limited land availability and a single large project would exhaust local capacity.
• County Commissioner perspective on county-city cooperationA county Commissioner emphasized the importance of unified county and city partnership to present a professional team to prospective developers.
• Public concerns regarding EDC contract and budget oversightA citizen speaker raised detailed concerns about the proposed economic development corporation contract, focusing on budget controls, accountability measures, and contract transparency.
• Proposed contract review processThe citizen speaker proposed a collaborative approach to refine the contract before formal adoption.
• Support for county investment in economic developmentA county official expressed support for the $100,000 county contribution as a reasonable investment in regional economic opportunity.